Contents
This systematic review and meta-analysis, titled "The COMPARE Study," assesses the 30-day perioperative outcomes of da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery (dV-RAS) compared to laparoscopic/thoracoscopic (lap/VATS) and open oncologic surgeries. The study included 230 publications covering seven procedures across four surgical specialties, analyzing data from over 1 million robotic surgeries and more than 2 million lap/VATS and open surgeries. The findings revealed that dV-RAS resulted in longer operative times compared to lap/VATS and open surgery but offered significant advantages, such as shorter hospital stays, fewer blood transfusions, lower conversion rates to open surgery, reduced postoperative complications, and lower mortality rates within 30 days. The results suggest that robotic-assisted surgery provides meaningful benefits over both traditional laparoscopic and open procedures in oncologic surgeries, particularly in terms of patient recovery and complication reduction.
Citation
Ricciardi R, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Yankovsky A, Dahl D, Auchincloss H, Patel NM, Hebert AE, Wright V. The COMPARE Study: Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic, Da Vinci Robotic, and Open Procedures: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis of The Evidence. Ann Surg. 2024 Oct 22. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006572. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39435549.
Link
No comments
You can write comments after you log in.