Contents
This article presents a comprehensive retrospective analysis comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Data from 208 patients were analyzed—97 underwent LSC, and 111 underwent RSC. The study found no significant differences in operative time, length of stay, or perioperative complications between the two groups. However, the RSC group tended to include patients with a higher BMI, making RSC a preferred option for more complex cases. Both techniques demonstrated similar effectiveness in correcting POP, with comparable postoperative outcomes. The study concludes that while both methods are safe and effective, the ergonomic advantages of robotic surgery may increase surgical efficiency, allowing for more procedures to be performed in a day. However, no clear superiority of RSC over LSC was demonstrated.
Citation
Dehan C, Marcelle S, Nisolle M, Munaut C, de Landsheere L. Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Oct 21.
Link
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-024-05942-w
No comments
You can write comments after you log in.