Contents
The authors performed a meta-analysis to evaluate survival outcomes between robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Twenty eligible clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. When all studies were pooled, the odds ratios of RRH for recurrence and death were 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.91-1.55; p=0.613; I²=0.0%) and 0.96 (95% CI=0.65-1.42; p=0.558; I²=0.0%), respectively. The concluded that the survival outcomes are comparable between RRH and LRH.
Citation
Hwang JH, Kim B. Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Jan;35(1):e9.
Link
https://www.ejgo.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e9
No comments
No previous posts.
You can write comments after you log in.